2010 Stanley Cup Finals Series Playoff Picks – Flyers vs. Blackhawks

The Stanley Cup Final Seven game series between the Philadelphia Flyers and the Chicago Blackhawks opens on Saturday. Here’s the odds and our prediction for the 2010 series.

NHL Playoff Betting – Blackhawks vs Flyers Series Preview & Pick

Stanley Cup Betting fans sure are getting their money’s worth from the free nhl picks we give out here at There are now 2 teams competing for Lord Stanley’s Cup. Stick with us for the entire 2010 NHL Stanley Cup finals playoff run.



GAME 1: @CHI, Sat. 5/29, 8 p.m.
GAME 2: @CHI, Mon. 5/31, 8 p.m.
GAME 3: @PHI, Wed. 6/2, 8 p.m.
GAME 4: @PHI, Fri. 6/4, 8 p.m.
*GAME 5: @CHI, Sun. 6/6, 8 p.m.
*GAME 6: @PHI, Wed. 6/9, 8 p.m.
*GAME 7: @CHI, Fri. 6/11, 8 p.m.

Blackhawks vs Flyers Odds To Win 7 Game Series: NHL FINAL SERIES PRICES BEST OF SEVEN 2-2-1-1-1


This should be exciting.

The Olympics already made 2010 a banner year for hockey in North America, the first few rounds of the playoffs continued that trend, and now we’re treated to one of the best big-market Stanley Cup final matchups in years. The Philadelphia Flyers haven’t won it all since the Broad Street Bullies’ glory days of the mid-1970s. The Chicago Blackhawks hope to end their NHL-worst, 49-year Cup drought.

Who will hoist Lord Stanley’s Mug? Here’s my breakdown of the series, complete with odds and my pick.


Game 1: Saturday, May 29, 8:00 p.m. ET

NHL odds to win series: Flyers +210, Blackhawks -240


Comparing the Flyers’ and Hawks’ offenses accomplishes two things: it shows us how similar their game plans are and that one team does the same thing as the other, but slightly better.

The Flyers employ a vicious, smothering forecheck – and that’s a staple of any Peter Laviolette-coached team. The harder hitters like Daniel Carcillo, Scott Hartnell and Mike Richards crash and bang the heck out of opposing blueliners and the smaller forwards like Arron Asham and Claude Giroux drape themselves on guys to force turnovers. The strategy worked brilliantly against the tiny Devils D, the undermanned Bruins group and the slow Habs unit.

Chicago’s strategy isn’t much different. It uses its tremendous size through guys like Dustin Byfuglien, Dave Bolland and, of course, runaway Conn Smythe Trophy favorite Jonathan Toews to hammer opponents on the forecheck. Arguably, however, the Hawks have more depth. Even their “skill” players, like Patrick Kane and Marian Hossa, are very strong on the puck and not afraid to get physical. Chicago rolls three lines with legit scoring ability. How about that third line of Bolland, Kris Versteeg and Andrew Ladd? Most teams would kill to have that trio as their second line.

Considering that Simon Gagne and Jeff Carter aren’t 100 per cent for the Flyers right now (broken feet), Chicago has the scoring edge. We also can’t discount the fact that Duncan Keith and Brian Campbell’s rushing ability from the back end trumps anything the Flyers have on defense.

Edge: Blackhawks


These are two extremely tough groups to play against. Chris Pronger is still a 30-minute-per-game horse and his game elevates in the playoffs because the referees let him get away with more. He has good support from smooth-skating Kimmo Timonen and big, well-rounded Braydon Coburn.

The Hawks are equally phenomenal in the back-end. The Flyers will bludgeon Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook with everything they have but those two guys can handle anything thrown at them since they have physicality to match their immense skill. Brent Sopel and Niklas Hjalmarsson are great role players, too.

Arguably, Chicago could have a slight defensive edge since its forwards are better backcheckers, but the difference is negligible. Sports Betting at

Edge: Even


We can definitely draw parallels between Michael Leighton and Anti Niemi. Both weren’t even sniffing starting jobs a year ago. Both have stood on their heads and stole the odd game in the playoffs. Both have also had to be just good, not great, more nights than not because of the outstanding defense in front of them. Seems like a pretty even matchup to me.

Edge: Even


Both teams have played well on special teams throughout the playoffs, with just minor blips here and there. The Hawks’ and Flyers power play and penalty kills have been almost identical in their efficiency this postseason.

It feels natural to assume the talent-heavy Hawks have the better power play with Toews and Kane out there and Byfuglien in front of the net. But we forget that Flyer forwards like Carter, Gagne and Daniel Briere have always been power-play specialists.

On the PK, each team fields outstanding units. The Flyers have the NHL’s most disruptive penalty killing forward in Mike Richards and the Hawks have a boatload of outstanding options, including Toews and Hossa – one of the league’s most underrated backcheckers.

Edge: Even


Both Peter Laviolette and Joel Quenneville have lots of great players to work with, but both men have legitimately boosted their teams’ efforts all season and throughout the playoffs. Laviolette has taught his team to be relentless on the forecheck but a bit more disciplined than before. Quenneville is a master of matchups, knowing when to put Keith and Seabrook on the ice and knowing when to split them up for maximum effectiveness.

Edge: Even


As the matchup breakdown indicates, this an extremely close final to call. In the end, however, the fact of the matter is that Chicago does everything that Philly does – but does it ever so slightly better. It has just a bit more depth and talent at forward and defense. Its blueline will be the first in these playoffs to neutralize the Flyers’ forecheck. It has home ice and the healthier lineup. It’s Chicago’s year to end the drought. Your move, Maple Leafs.

Prediction: Blackhawks in six


2 replies on “2010 Stanley Cup Finals Series Playoff Picks – Flyers vs. Blackhawks”

I stopped taking your article seriously once you showed your bias and lack of knowledge. You stated that Lavlioette’s “strategy worked brilliantly against the tiny Devils D, the undermanned Bruins group and the slow Habs unit”. The Devils are not tiny and they have the nhl’s best goaltender; the Bruins were undermanned? Thye had 2 injuries and the Flyers did not have Gagne until game 4, and missed Carter and LaPerierre the entire series and had a golaie injury as well. In the Flyers Canadiens series alloine heard about was how fast but small the Canadiens were? How is it you see them as “slow”? Actually they were called a smaller version of the Hawks.

Next, you mention Chicago’s tremendous size like Dustin Byfuglien, Dave Bolland
(6’1″ 181 lbs) and Toews 6’2″ 210lbs. That’s size? The Flyers 4th line checking Center Betts is 6’3″ 210 lbs. Pronger is 6’6″ 220lbs and Coburn is 6’5″ 220. The Hawks have no defenseman that big. Even Lukas Krajicek is 6′ 3″ 205 lbs.

Your comment that Duncan Keith and Brian Campbell’s rushing ability from the back end trumps anything the Flyers have on defense. Are you kidding. Have you seen Coburn and Timmonen rush the puck up ice?? The Flyers top 4 D are like nothing the Hawks have seen in the playoffs. That gives the Flyers the edge,

Flyers in 6. You’ll see.

Spoken like a true Flyers fan.

1) How does having the NHL’s best goaltender magically make New Jersey not tiny on defen se?

2) You answerered the Bruins question yourself — you admitted they had injured guys. So how is that NOT being undermanned?

3) The Canadians are extremely fast — at FORWARD. The comment on their slow unit in the article referred specifically to their defense. Sorry – didn’t realize Hal Gill and Paul Mara were speed demons!

4) Coburn a great puck mover? Hmm, then why didn’t he make team Canada? Seems to me that Keith was the guy logging 30 minutes a game en route to the gold and Coburn didn’t make the team.

It’s one thing to try and pick apart an article — but dude, you have no grounds for any of your arguments! You’re clearly just a poorly informed Flyers fan. Do your homework next time!

(For the record, I’m not a Hawks fan or Flyers fan)

Comments are closed.